-
The UKGBC's task group looking at PAYS has published its report (look for the link on the home page). Thankfully, it looks like councils (rather than the Big 6) are the preferred collection mechanism. But the report seems to swing between 1) admitting that significant contribution from govt or end users will be required and 2) claiming that any subsidies will be "modest" and merely an incentive to "encourage uptake". Reading through now with more to follow.
-
Great article from Forum for the Future. "To have an all-electric paradigm shift within the next decade, says Richard Gott, we’ll need some sort of major disruption to petroleum supplies – like a war, or some other huge economic or climatic disaster." How about just peak oil?
links for 2009-08-07
August 8, 2009 by Casey Cole
One Response
Leave a Reply
- My Tweets
categories
Recent Comments
AlanDHill@hotmail.co… on the myth of stone walls as… Comment: What would… on why we’ll share Open… Laurie on the myth of stone walls as… Michael Millar on getting district heating right… Casey Cole on getting district heating right… Michael Millar on getting district heating right… Marko Cosic on Filling the skills gap won… Top Posts
archive
- January 2019
- August 2018
- October 2017
- July 2017
- March 2017
- January 2017
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- July 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- October 2015
- August 2015
- June 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- June 2011
- January 2011
- October 2010
- August 2010
- June 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
Casey
What are your thoughts on PAYS for new build? I can see the reasoning on refurb/existing, but for new build seems to add more questions than answers?
If we agree polluter pays is the most sensible way forward, then who is the polluter? The builder (who has a free hand in choosing the equipment, albeit within economic constraints) or the occupier, who may use energy indiscriminately or frugally, but within the constraints of the equipment someone else has imposed on them?
As I understand it, it will be an extra charge, possibly added to council tax. Will people’s ‘mental accounting’ put them off the idea of buying a house with larger flat charges (even if variable energy bills will be lower?).
I can see that it might incentivise builders to not install the cheapest possible option, but what will be the effects on the market for micro-renewables? Any kind of incentive/tax distorts things and I’m thinking myself round in circles until I’ve no idea what will happen! Cheaper/more expensive/surplus/scarcity???
Look forward to your post